Just Let Me -- G -- Indoctrinate You!

Showing posts with label Dr. Ron Paul. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr. Ron Paul. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

It's an All Grown Up Thing

Dear America,

obama is in puerto rico right this minute.
interesting.
first time a president has visited in fifty years.
political?   nah

Such is the administration of "transparency" --  we only get some in the areas a see through curtain isn't necessary,  warranted, or in the least bit, should be encouraged -- which covers all kinds of indiscretions, large and small, from the countless days leading as Campaigner-in-Chief and feeding the audience what it wants to hear --  to his minions, like the twitter-twit of an Anthony Wiener...which falls into the TMI category right quick.  boys will be boys.

happy tuesday everybody.  moving on to other things...

so --  last night -- the debate in New Hampshire -- sure did a bang up job solidifying the repeal of a presidency gone wild (and with it: obamacare, the unsanctioned war in Libya, the power of the federal reserve, the overzealous actions of the EPA, the growth of government...to the tune of 35% increase of our debt and the 20% unsustainable growth of our federal bureaucracy just to name the top five on the night).

That, along with casting a brand new light of things of little or no importance, bearing insight on the likes and dislikes for fascinating, yet petty points of interest.  For instance, Cain prefers "deep dish" over thin -- and Bachmann (in the only moment of the debate when she sounded indecisive), when she could not make up her mind between Elvis Presley or Johnny Cash.  [G note: going with a 'little less conversation' over 'walking the line' without even skipping a beat.]

Taking the lead from last night's moderator, CNN's John King, if we go the route of "this or that" or pass or fail, allow me to break things down in a jiffy:

Gingrich gave it a go to redeem himself (pass);

Pawlenty gave a fighting spirit to shake his 'vanilla-ness' (pass);

Cain gave it grandpa love with his folksy werther's appeal (pass);

Paul gave it a big throw down on the Fed, the Federal Reserve, and nearly every federal facet run amuck known to man, sometimes without taking a breath (pass);

Santorum gave it the college try against the oppressor flashing his young guns all around (pass);

Romney gave it full throttle politician (pass); and

Bachmann gave it her good girl goes to washington -- with all of her 28 kids -- and brings home the bacon and fries it up in the pan and still finding time to look damn good,  making it all look so easy breezy beautiful cover girl (pass).  [yes, go right ahead, and count all the decades we touched upon there]

They all passed, and some with flying colors.

The common refrain was making Obama a one term president; and even, just Today, the president remarked on just that:  From the Today Show with Ann Curry, he said, "Michelle and the kids are wonderful in that if I said, 'You know, guys, I want to do something different,' they'd be fine. They're not invested in daddy being president or my husband being president. But they do believe in what we're doing,"  Fine by me.  For more, go here.

All in all, any one of these guys (and doll) would be totally worthy of the office of the presidency -- not to say, that we, the people, do not have personal preferences already lining up.  We do.  But isn't it wonderful that the gang of seven last night are shades of what is to come.

And more than that, I am pleased to see that, more often than not, the diversity within the party is something of both mystery and majesty in motion; conservatives, especially, are not all cut from the same cloth -- we do not agree, hands down, on all things.  And what a joy it is to witness; there are all kinds of possibilities even when following along in ideology and standing side by side on stage; albeit somewhat predictable in part, it was a lively debate on ideas even within a single political thread.

Unlike the narrow minded pattern leading from the Left -- who seem to run on riot, rage, agenda and chaos -- the right is not led by the Union label, manufacturing divisiveness to create the fabric of social change, all the while usurping the powers of the people and this republic's Constitution.  The Right welcomes the opportunity for debate on the merits, in hopes of weaving the best solution, on all fronts from head to toe.

We have only just begun the political process of electing the next president of the United States.  But if all goes right, it will be someone brand new.  We don't have all the answers yet; all that has yet to be revealed.

And, as such, the anticipation alone might just get the best of us.  kinda of like waiting for a birthday or something.  America is experiencing a deep-seated need for change, only different; for it is all about the fundamental return to the finer details of what it means to keep our REPUBLIC safe and sound.

The thing is, we might be growing up.

And much like the benefits and challenges of growing a year older, we are wiser and fully aware of the set of new responsibilities that come along with reaching a new age -- and, at the same time, we are filled with excitement for all the brand new things that we can do now that we are, you know,  a year older and wiser.

We know what to do with the brand new bike; for we know what we did with the last one -- the one left out in the rain for days on end, the same one we have habitually thrown to the side of the house without a care of either scratch or knocking off the bell.  We know what we did last summer, and the summer before that, and the one before that. 

All we could ever want now is another chance from the folks to trust us, for this time would be different -- even though, deep down we know,  we hardly deserve it (we just would never be caught dead admitting it).  Strangely, something seems to be happening within us -- that, along with our voices squeaking -- we have reached a pivotal time in our lives all together; and, in a remarkable turn of the seasons, we get it now; we know, that if we got a chance to do it all again,  we would cherish that bike in every way.

Of course, all things considered,  it is hardly worth lamenting all the ways we abused the old red schwinn -- not in this age where the misery index loves company; it is just time to move on and begin anew.  Out with the old and in with the new -- even if it is blue. (like everything else these days, "shovel ready was not as shovel ready as to be expected" per obama, hardy har har, meeting with his jobs council just yesterday, but I digress)


We will take what we get and roll with it.
We will take good care of it and never take it for granted again.
We will revel in the new age, a new morning in America -- and thrive --  riding like the wind.
And, we will, never forget. 

happy birthday to me -- and to you -- a new day is about to begin.  Last night reminded me of how much I can hardly wait --  and, who knows, like birthday wish lists past and present, we might change our mind a number of times before the year is done and then some; which, in my experience, is a phenomenon totally expected dealing with the adolescent mind (and don't argue with me, we are, as I scream from the other room and slamming the door behind me).  Roll the eyes here.

In any event, yippy skippy  -- hip hip hooray for miss usa -- she just might turn out alright.  time will tell.and, shedding some light on mama's little secret,  goes a whole lot better with a little wine.  cheers.

and, just maybe it is time for a girl to take the handle bars.

Make it a Good Day, G

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Dear America,


Move over 60 Minutes, hindsight is 20/20.  And they're right (usually).

Isn't it so easy to sound off on things after the fact; isn't it brilliant to arrive at a whole slew of  new found conclusions and alternative solutions, after something's been tried and discovered untrue.

What becomes really spectacular is finding out, after everything's been said and done, that when everything said and done was proposed, long before the done was ever said, that an agreement of how to tell the story had long been reached and agreed upon...even if it appears to be a mistake, an injustice, to the level of looking like a myriad of transgressions and aggressions against a sovereign nation and "ally."

Oh I am a rambling girl today.  Just what has got me babbling, you ask?

Pakistan...while the Bushmeister rears his beautiful mind once again.


Read this.
To coin a poetic phrase from the A-Team, "don't you love it when a plan comes together."

Say what? you didn't want to go the extra mile...here...let me pick out a couple of key phrases of foresight:

"The deal was struck between the military leader General Pervez Musharraf and President George Bush after Bin Laden escaped US forces in the mountains of Tora Bora in late 2001, according to serving and retired Pakistani and US officials.

Under its terms, Pakistan would allow US forces to conduct a unilateral raid inside Pakistan in search of Bin Laden, his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and the al-Qaida No3. Afterwards, both sides agreed, Pakistan would vociferously protest the incursion.

'There was an agreement between Bush and Musharraf that if we knew where Osama was, we were going to come and get him,' said a former senior US official with knowledge of counterterrorism operations. 'The Pakistanis would put up a hue and cry, but they wouldn't stop us.'"

somehow, somebody, namely a George W., decidedly recognized a possible betrayal in the making; while in an area of the world where, let's face it, takes great consideration of how egos work large and small -- 'saving face' becomes a key negotiating tool.  How Pakistan "spontaneously" responded in "anger" all of a sudden becomes just another part of the plan.  Brilliant, isn't it?


Now, I doubt we would hear a word of this from the Obama Administration -- who, with special clearances and being privy to classified information -- knew of this all along.  Leave it to the guardian.uk to get the word out.

Here's another piece of foresight, now part of the hindsight, looking back:
"The agreement is consistent with Pakistan's unspoken policy towards CIA drone strikes in the tribal belt, which was revealed by the WikiLeaks US embassy cables last November. In August 2008, Gilani reportedly told a US official: 'I don't care if they do it, as long as they get the right people. We'll protest in the National Assembly and then ignore it.'"

that is wicked good. again, kudos to Declan Walsh for the guardian.co.uk.

Now there is someone who has been consistent with his stance on the war on terror for years; he's not just jumping on the newly organized mission to get out of the occupancy of the middle east as fast as possible -- he was already there, holding tight to our founder's libertarianism in us.  The guy who never requires a hindsight before making a sound, righteous, conscientious, decision respective of all sides, deeply keen on the original intent of this country, not to mention our golden rule, is Dr. Ron Paul.

He has an opinion column in today's Daily Bell, which as usual, is ringing off the hook.

"Hopefully bin Laden does not get the last laugh. He claimed the 9/11 attacks were designed to get the US to spread its military dangerously and excessively throughout the Middle East, bankrupting us through excessive military spending as he did the Soviets, and to cause political dissension within the United States. Some 70 percent of Americans now believe we should leave Afghanistan yet both parties seem determined to stay. The best thing we could do right now is prove bin Laden a false prophet by coming home and ending this madness on a high note."

Sure, hindsight plays a part in all this now; but to be fair, Dr. Paul has always held this position, and has never wavered. Why?  Because his mind  (as hokey as the man may sound) is, and was, wrapped around the principle of the argument --  not the politics --  the whole entire time.  Principle.  Truth.  Honor.  Integrity.  Six out of ten guts concur, these are the things that will always win in the end.

The thing is, everyone has their own gut feeling.  In a world where nothing stays the same, we make decisions based on the information we know in the moment along side the intuition we carry deep inside us.  Each and every one of us has a gut feeling, for better or worse; sometimes we listen to it, sometimes we don't -- while sometimes, even with solid, proven information right in front of us, even with the best intentions, our gut might just get it wrong. And honestly, it's probably only a 50-50 chance by today's standards.

Bush got the WMD's wrong -- or did he?  Tunnels go every which way but loose under Iraq...there was time to get rid of every shred of evidence.  Not to mention, Bush was operating at a time immediately following a catastrophic attack on America (it's real easy to pick on him for that even years later); and even though I am not "his gut"  -- I dare say, all of his actions came from a place which needed to respond to every bad guy known to man.  Sure, Poland might be used it, but for America, we were vulnerable to outside forces on American soil for only the second time in our history!  The real truth in this matter we may never come to know (and who are we kidding, what your gut says about it is the only thing that matters, am I right? our minds have been made up...no budging or turning back now...let's roll)

But let's focus on the reality Dr. Paul is illuminating here...the very thought that bin Laden led us right smack into the desert: "[Osama] claimed the 9/11 attacks were designed to get the US to spread its military dangerously and excessively throughout the Middle East, bankrupting us through excessive military spending as he did the Soviets, and to cause political dissension within the United States."  check and check mate.

For myself, I know in my heart, I evolve has a human being -- I learn new things, I discover new perspectives, I lean one way or another based on my experiences (i.e. usually thru my failures), my education, my beliefs, my faith, my respect of good over evil -- and even though I may believe I know what's right from wrong in my heart, my perspective may be very different from another.  Even still, generally speaking, my mistakes in life have been when I didn't listen to my gut, or turned off my gut altogether. While, in fair play, decisions I make today are far more evolved from when I was twelve...at least, we can only hope.

Somewhere, deep inside each and every one of us, is a knowledge superior to none.

America has made mistakes drifting from our first principles, our first intentions made into a reality and eloquently captured in our prized first documents --  that, of course, being our Declaration of Independence...our Federalist Papers...our Bill of Rights...our Constitution!

The more we have rationalized a continuation of poor choices, veering from the path to set us free, the more we have suffered.  We have essentially turned off our gut decades ago, and have simply grown accustomed to reinventing excuses, creating even greater challenges to overcome, in hopes of hiding the very truth that what we've really done is messed up. Big time.

We have messed up.  And it's nobody else' fault but our own.  Today, all things considered, hindsight is a bitch and a half (but hey, I could be wrong).

make it a good day, G

thing is...it is real easy being an armchair quarterback... especially if we add hindsight, and with or without foresight; if we had not captured and killed bin Laden, would the prevailing winds to question the mission in Afghanistan, vacate the troops, really be happening? Does the absence of one madman change everything?  Did we have this wrong all along?  What would TJ do in this instance? Who's gut do we go with?