the whole thing kinda makes me sick to my stomach...
what were they thinking?
Announcing, upon the very eve of 9/11, that we are going to take in 10,000 Syrian refugees over the next year.
Is this with, or without, the people's consent?
"The fabric of American empire
ought to rest on the solid basis
of THE CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE.
of national power ought to flow
immediately from that pure,
of all legitimate authority."
Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers
Or how about this one, from James Madison:
"The adversaries of the Constitution seem to have lost sight of the PEOPLE altogether in their reasoning on this subject; and to have viewed these different establishments not only as mutual rivals and enemies, but as uncontrolled by any common superior in their efforts to usurp the authorities of each other. These gentlemen must here be reminded of their error. They must be told that the ULTIMATE AUTHORITY, wherever the derivative may be found, RESIDES IN THE PEOPLE ALONE." (The 5000 Year Leap, Skousen, quoting Madison, Federalist Papers, Skousen added the emphasis)
for "the adversaries of the Constitution" reign supreme in the house that Divine Providence built.
Just where, oh where, is the proper flow of a just government? A process fully intended to be seen bubbling up, with a certain effervescence of individual liberty and power, through the fundamental, elusive, organic channels of that "pure, original fountain of all legitimate authority."
Seventy-Five percent of the American PEOPLE are against this thing called the Iran Nuclear Deal. While to that end -- it is in fact A TREATY -- and as such, it is REQUIRED to go through CONGRESS for approval; but no -- the Democrats have shut down the process entirely. That's what was voted on yesterday; the Senate DEMOCRATS voted to NOT bring this unconscionable arrangement of monumental lunacy to a vote.
While, even if we were to call it just some kind of random act of idiocracy -- made with terrorists, mind you -- then all the more the reason congress must be given ALL the information, including side deals in order to legitimize any of it.
And yet, upon this day -- ever mindful of the crime against America made 14 years ago this morning -- let us be grateful it is NOT a treaty; for the next president can just say, no -- and on behalf of the American people, go nuclear and tear it up.
Today is all about the "adversaries of the Consitution" --
So, here we are -- this administration, or dare I say one man, is deciding for the rest of us; the executive office has spoken, and again, unapologetic-ally upon the eve of 9/11, the outrageous extension of our commitment to meet the Middle East half way has been declared (and then some).
Effective immediately, we are not only opening the floodgates to America by way of southern invasion, and in the process burying the American people financially even more through the massive flow of undocumented, illegal, lawless, illiterates -- but NOW, now we are taking on Syrian "refugees," and by virtue of coming to the aid of a catastrophic humanitarian need [man-made by the way by Obama himself !!!!] open ourselves up to God only knows. [THREEEEE REAAAALLY GOOD LINKS THERE THERE and THERE]
Borders? What borders?
Terrorists? What terrorists?
President Obama might as well be saying:
Well, if the American people continue to cling to their beliefs, their traditions, even their g-d-holidays -- then by all means -- let's just change the demographics in order to meet up with the progressive goals of a new world order [one that includes a smack down of the American people, their way of life, their beliefs, their self-reliance, their liberty, their entire country, if that's what it takes...who really gives a flying f@$&].
From Constitutional Lawyer, Professor, Authority... to President Chief-Adversary-of the- Constitution Obama. It only took seven years -- with the American people watching in cheers or jeers, all depending upon which side of lady liberty you sit.
"Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest, with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force take a drink from the Ohio or make a track on the Blue Ridge in a trial of a thousand years. At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer. If it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide."
Now -- from one president to another to another -- HE was one of America's very best: Abraham Lincoln.
So -- here we are -- upon the anniversary of an horrific attack against America, and all Americans for which she stands, and we open our sovereign borders, our way of life, our security, our livelihoods, our sacred honor, to pure evil.
Who needs to bring in "an army" when you have people -- people with every intent to do harm on America?
...People with intent to take advantage, of America....
...People with intent to change, disrupt, and hardly assimilate with the ideals of this beautiful country, America....
...People with intent to usurp every Constitutional authority, and process thereof, while exercising their unsanctioned right to wreak havoc upon America.
This is where we are today.
Whether South American, Mexican, Syrian, Iranian -- or even a Sitting President -- it's all the same.
They are ALL adversaries of the Constitution.
But worse -- they seem to appear to have the consent of the people, when in fact, they don't.
It's a sad day all the way around.
Make it a Good Day, G
FOR ENLIGHTENMENT and some great stories --- GO TO Tom Deweese, for his essay from August 31st, titled Patriots vs. Politicians 2015. And pass it on...........