Just Let Me -- G -- Indoctrinate You!

Showing posts with label James Clapper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Clapper. Show all posts

Monday, August 20, 2018

It's a blog worthy of a crime scene Thing, like killin' it

Dear America,

"We're not going to make America great again. 
It was never that great."
andrew cuomo

summer composition numero cinco

#948
signing in.
I almost never use red to highlight my quotes -- it's always pink
.... it's simply translating my emotions, is all.

and by the way -- it doesn't matter the context being centered upon gender equality, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah...whatever, andrew.  you ingratiot.  that's speaking G for ingrate and idiot, a word that just so happens to describe many Americans today -- at least, to those Americans who were spoon-fed a slew of liberal dribble, or, unfortunately, indoctrinated by an education system with a penchant for re-writing the history of the world, especially the new world.

But to concentrate on the most provocative point he was making, that America "was never that great," explains just how much animosity the Left seems to have towards America's foundation, its founders, our republic, and everything most average Americans still hold very dear.  Oh the lengths a liberal must go to separate from the crowd -- as he is now running for re-election as governor of the state of New York ---  and up against another leftist loon, Cynthia Nixon.

Gotta love her reply, though -- “I think this is just another example of Andrew Cuomo trying to figure out what a progressive sounds like and missing by a mile.”     hilarious

It's just so weird though.

It's a wonder people ever flocked to America, ever at all, right?  
It's a wonder people still come to America ....believing it to be the best country on earth...or, at least, the welfare state of choice and location location location.

It was never that great, he says.
Oh ok andrew.

It was never that great...says the guy who's American roots haven't even reached a hundred years old.

I believe, even without knowing him, that his father -- Mario --  felt a deeper allegiance to America than this punk; but what do i know, I'm just a girl...teehee.

And going out on a family limb now, just guessing, that an Italian, emigrating to America in the 1920's, might have left his homeland for a pretty good reason, um like, perhaps, a brighter future; and given America gave Mario just that ---- as in the stature of a career in the public eye, a gracious income over the years.....one that probably allowed him to give andrew and chris and maria and madeline everything they ever needed....it's just no wonder, right?

They are openly described as an "American political family" on Wikipedia.  To which, all I can add is and-how-mo.

We should gather, then, just adding it up with one generation to the next...politics IS the family business.  Meaning, that politics is not only the only thing andrew knows, it is his entire universe in the business of communication; everything that is said, or properly framed, or narrated, revolves around the political appeal or gain. [Just like many of America's political crime families........]

Lots of times in America, things are said and framed for political gain....and it isn't just in politics directly.

Take, for instance, the latest dust up after Brennan's comments and op-ed....

John Brennan: President Trump’s Claims of No Collusion Are Hogwash
That’s why the president revoked my security clearance: to try to silence anyone who would dare challenge him.


Isn't it funny how clear brennan is of the so-called collusion.....when where's the proof?  Do you know something that the entire intelligence community and the Mueller team do not know, let alone have been able to prove? Or is this just your way of responding to the embarrassment of losing your high level security clearance?

In the words of the president, "Has anyone looked at the mistakes that John Brennan made while serving as CIA Director? He will go down as easily the WORST in history & since getting out, he has become nothing less than a loudmouth, partisan, political hack who cannot be trusted with the secrets to our country!"

and then brennan said..."As I’m being pulled through the mud now, if that’s the price we’re going to pay to prevent Donald Trump from doing this against other people, to me it’s a small price to pay,” Brennan said. “If it means going to court, I’ll do that.

and then the president said...."I hope John Brennan, the worst CIA Director in our country’s history, brings a lawsuit," the president tweeted Monday morning. "It will then be very easy to get all of his records, texts, emails and documents to show not only the poor job he did, but how he was involved with the Mueller Rigged Witch Hunt. He won’t sue!"

I wonder, just where oh where did all this nonsensical imbecilic nonsense begin.... um....

going back to brennan from a month ago, who said..."Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of “high crimes & misdemeanors.” It was nothing short of treasonous. Not only were Trump’s comments imbecilic, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin. Republican Patriots: Where are you???

Oh my,  THAT was nothing short of political theater, john brennan, nothing short.

Oh and so now you wanna say, it was just his behavior that was "treasonous."

And from Meet the Press to Maddow....the politics thicken, when he said to she said...."I didn’t mean that he committed treason, but it was a term that I used, nothing short of treasonous." 

all this girl can say is teehee at this point....but moving on dot org.....

and then, from The Hill,  another senior fellow intelligence dude -- james clapper -- stepped into the fray, saying..."John and his rhetoric have become an issue in and of itself...[john] is subtle like a freight train and he’s gonna say what’s on his mind."

And getting one more in for good riddance, this, from the same article in The Hill, only this comment coming from "Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) on Thursday took aim at Brennan for 'purport[ing] to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power.'

'If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel, not The New York Times,' Burr said."

exactly.
which is it brennan? a breach or a dis to special counsel and proper lines of communication?

Oh yes, isn't politics simply the most shameless profession ever!  like, gosh, it's never a dull moment, everybody always has something to say; everybody throws out nonsense and one-two punches and rhetoric....in politics...all the     live        long      day. 

like, every single day.

newsflash:  Trump did not invent it. 

And how about all the lies and rhetoric out of the Obama administration -- from Hillary's use of an UNLAWFUL and unsecured private server, her deleted emails, the DNC being hacked, lies within the DNC during the 2016 campaign, the creation of the false dossier, Hillary's foundation colluding with the Russians and profiting over nuclear materials, um, what else, oh the lies about Benghazi, the lies about Operation Fast and Furious, and then going an entirely different direction, all that aggression against the press...anyone?   And brennan was where?

The thing is -- there are areas of government that should hold a higher level of security OF ITS OWN POLITICAL AGENDA!   As in, nip it, zip it, or we will forever lose it as a nation.

Like, the Supreme Court, for one...actually, make that more like for nine. [budget 7 billion dollars]

Like, the FBI...for another 35,000. [budget of 8.7 billion]

Like, the CIA...for another 21,500 (estimate, right....like we can't tell anybody anything, it's all pretty much top secret or we make it up, right, brennan?  badump ba)   [budget of 14.7 billion]

Like the Department of Justice...employing roughly 115,000 people!  With a budget of, what, 31 BILLION dollars....Is that for real?  Holy crap...

So if you are following me along, with a budget of over 60 BILLION dollars, the American people are paying a lot of muckin' funny for people to remain unbiased and professional at all times, in the business of national security and the Rule of Law (and Order).

Sure, brennan can say what he wants to say as a private person....except, perhaps, when you make things up against a sitting president.  brennan was always at choice -- he could have taken the high road; but no, he went low, and thus came the wrath and consequences.

And besides --- nobody has a right to keep a security clearance; matter of fact, if you ask me, it shouldn't be a given; it should be given back upon the moment you exit the building. And if ever such time you need one again, the encumbrance of the process to qualify is upon the applicant, no matter who you are.

The American Political Familia known as cuomo is taking a hit after choosing to go low against the country he was born and raised into the upper political echelon.

that is evident by the mere fact that he is in the midst of "walking it back" all the way to little Italy and back.

Oh sure -- he can claim that, in the moment, he was being "inartful" -- but we all know the truth.

It was artfully staged and set for the political theater.  [oh and brennan, he's just a political hack and doesn't deserve to be near any of our nation's top secrets....like, ever, omgosh]

the end.

Make it a Good Day, G


Tuesday, August 20, 2013

It's Opposites Attract Thing

Dear America,

 so we left off trying to decipher which side was picked...

you know,
in Egypt.

Given last night's pre-season Monday Night Football game on ESPN -- it didn't really matter the side, win or lose.  It was pre-season no less and no more.  Half the time the star players aren't even on the field; where's the fun in that?

Having said that, however, ESPN did pick a side; it was during half-time; did you catch it?  Oh, it happened so nonchalantly, so innocently, hiding in the shadows of a birthday celebration for Jon Gruden (turning 50!) -- if you popped into the kitchen for another brewski, you may have missed it altogether.   Gruden's sidekick, Mike Tirico, handed him a mock, large scale, AARP card on national TV.   Just like that!

Mike, mike, mike, mike, mike didn't even offer Gruden a fair and balanced alternative to the uber-liberal, obamacare tooting, hidden agenda oozing, piece of bureaucratic AA-BS worthy of retirement itself.  Did AARP pay for that plug, or what?  Inquiring minds wanna know.

Oh whatever.
Let old Gthing -- in the fifty-something, something category, herself -- give you another way to go:  AMAC.  It's the Association of Mature American Citizens (over 50) and offers a patriotic, conservative alternative route to take...think of it more like running a reverse, if you must; or perhaps, a quarterback sneak, right up the middle; maybe even a sweep worthy of a tweet for moving your feet to defeat the other side.  Whatever play gets you through the day.

But needless to say -- I stopped watching the game right then and there.  It was only pre-season; who really cares, right?

Like yesterday (give or take), we are continuing on a theme -- it's all about the picking of sides today...

And let's get another thing absolutely clear!

It was just a kiss -- not a kiss kiss, okay?

Speaking of the Russian lipstick lesbian kiss seen 'round the world -- smoooooch.  Care of French24 news online, as featured on Drudge over the last couple of days, the two who lip locked were just happy!  IT WAS NOT TAKING A SIDE, okay!  HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT!...we are both happily married...not having any relationship...it's insulting, what you --  in the media -- are saying...

Okay.

Now it may be true, girls; you know -- that whole happily married thing, and all.  But let's face it -- you two were making a statement in support of a side.   Given the impossibility, in your country, to speak freely about gay relations clear of penalty or punishment -- a relay sneaky peak of resistance, behind enemy lines, raised the rainbow flag without coming out and saying a word.  It's done and done.  Boom.  Of course you aren't making a statement; the statement not making a statement refutes any semblance of a statement.   At the end of the day, it was truly a marvel of defiance and beauty and wits.

And now to Obama --

Are you -- are you halting aid, or what?
And more important -- is this picking a side, or not?

If you are -- you know, NOT aiding and abetting the Egyptian Military who overthrew President Morsi, representative of the Muslim Brotherhood, in a coup -- then does that mean you are essentially supporting the Brotherhood?

So says someone, somewhere within the administration, according to The Daily Beast, but care of Fox News (did you catch that; that was like a double reverse on the fly):

The decision was we're going to avoid saying it was a coup, but to stay on the safe side of the law, we are going to act as if the designation has been made for now. By not announcing the decision, it gives the administration the flexibility to reverse it.


Oh I get it now.

Remember now, like our Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, once said -- back in 2011:

"The term 'Muslim Brotherhood'...is an umbrella term for a variety of movements, in the case of Egypt, a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried Al Qaeda as a perversion of Islam," Clapper said. "They have pursued social ends, a betterment of the political order in Egypt, et cetera.....In other countries, there are also chapters or franchises of the Muslim Brotherhood, but there is no overarching agenda, particularly in pursuit of violence, at least internationally."


And thank you, Politico, for the help down memory lane -- because not every thing can be five cents or come from Fox News, right?    (For the complete Politico post, go here).

But back to Clapper.  The Brotherhood is simply about the pursuit of happiness for social ends, for the betterment of the whole, while it's a rather "heterogeneous group, largely secular," too; "there are also chapters or franchises of the Muslim Brotherhood" all over the place; and there is no "overarching agenda" and no more a concern than the golden arches of MickeyD's.  And to that end -- the Brotherhood has "eschewed violence" in every way.   Yay team!

If we are no longer sending aid to the Egyptian military, we are choosing to support the other side -- which, lo and behold, is the Muslim Brotherhood.  Oh what to do, what to do.  The art of war, and the art of picking a side without saying a word.

Welcome to that sweet spot between a rock and a hard place.

Not to worry; the thing is -- me thinks the side will be picking for us (again).  

Oh, the Obama Doctrine; it just loves leading from behind, doesn't it now?  [And like the Egyptian PM, Hazem el-Beblawi, said to ABC , responding to the rumors of aid-gate  -- "ah, it would be a bad sign...ah you know, humans, ah, you can survive...ah...don't forget, we had Russian military support for decades...ah...]  Indeed.

Oh to be back at the place when we really have a choice.  

It's gonna sound tres cliché, much like everything I say -- but our defense could sure use a rest; just where, oh where, is the offense when we need it?

Make it a Good Day, G